Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Crown Holdings, Inc.
How Crown Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CCK · against 154 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #46 of 155 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CCK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | 5.8% | 4.9% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 157 reported | 11.1% | 8.5% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | 9.1% | 5.8% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 22.1% | 29.9% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 41 | 53.5B CNY (≈$7.5B) | 66 | 45 | |
| 43 | 8.0B USD | 65 | 48 | |
| 43 | 24.2B USD | 65 | 66 | |
| 45 | 13.5B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 46 | 13.1B USD | 63 | 56 | |
| 47 | 10.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 47 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 62 | 71 | |
| 49 | 151.9B HKD (≈$19.4B) | 61 | 77 | |
| 49 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 61 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score