Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCJ · against 44 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #17 of 45 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CCJ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCJ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 46 reported | 0.14× | 0.36× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 45 reported | 1.13 | 0.42 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 44 reported | 2.55× | 1.34× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 22.9B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 4 | 29.1B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 93 | 62 | |
| 13 | 266.1B CNY (≈$37.3B) | 70 | 61 | |
| 14 | 113.8B BRL (≈$20.5B) | 69 | 65 | |
| 15 | 1.15T THB (≈$32.1B) | 68 | 53 | |
| 16 | 4.69T JPY (≈$31.9B) | 67 | 67 | |
| 17 | 31.6B USD | 67 | 56 | |
| 18 | 20.8B USD | 65 | 83 | |
| 19 | 571.7B THB (≈$16.0B) | 65 | 62 | |
| 20 | 42.5B USD | 65 | 56 | |
| 21 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 65 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score