Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCJ · against 195 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #56 of 196 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CCJ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCJ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 190 reported | 0.14× | 0.58× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 186 reported | 1.13 | 0.58 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 197 reported | 2.55× | 1.44× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 5 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 52 | 883M USD | 69 | 42 | |
| 53 | 7.9B USD | 68 | 79 | |
| 54 | 6.6B USD | 68 | 38 | |
| 55 | 2.7B USD | 67 | 50 | |
| 56 | 31.6B USD | 67 | 56 | |
| 57 | 89.1B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 58 | 1.5B USD | 66 | 51 | |
| 59 | 441.9B USD | 66 | 57 | |
| 60 | 20.8B USD | 65 | 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score