Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCCC · against 422 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #291 of 423 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CCCC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 388 reported | 0.23× | 0.19× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 408 reported | 3.08 | 0.45 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 415 reported | 5.45× | 2.90× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 3 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.7B CNY (≈$375M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 287 | 3.3B CNY (≈$463M) | 35 | 26 | |
| 288 | 471M USD | 35 | 21 | |
| 289 | 2.8B CNY (≈$394M) | 35 | 39 | |
| 290 | 23.7B INR (≈$284M) | 34 | 58 | |
| 291 | 395M USD | 34 | 30 | |
| 292 | 5.8B HKD (≈$739M) | 34 | 44 | |
| 293 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 33 | 44 | |
| 294 | 2.0B CNY (≈$284M) | 33 | 34 | |
| 295 | 471M NZD (≈$282M) | 33 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score