Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
How Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. stacks up
CCAP · against 61 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #52 of 62 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CCAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.9% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | -1.0% | 5.4% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | Not reported | 7.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 11.5% | 8.2% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 190.5% | 109.5% | 88% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 12.8B THB (≈$359M) | 97 | 55 | |
| 5 | 6.8B THB (≈$191M) | 96 | 41 | |
| 48 | 555.6B CLP (≈$611M) | 34 | 50 | |
| 49 | 3.6B CNY (≈$502M) | 33 | 42 | |
| 50 | 331M EUR (≈$364M) | 31 | 33 | |
| 51 | 333M EUR (≈$366M) | 26 | 45 | |
| 52 | 345M USD | 24 | 21 | |
| 53 | 308M EUR (≈$338M) | 20 | 40 | |
| 54 | 434M USD | 16 | 43 | |
| 55 | 336M USD | 15 | ||
| 56 | 394M USD | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score