Ranked #126 of 208 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
13 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CBSH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 77% of peers. Book yield: 54.6% vs peer median 79.5%
●Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CBSH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CBSH
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 213 reported
7.5%
7.8%
46%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported
Not reported
9.7%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 116 reported
15.4%
9.3%
82%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 207 reported
53.0%
74.5%
33%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
