Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cerebras Systems Inc.
How Cerebras Systems Inc. stacks up
CBRS · against 148 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #149 of 149 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including CBRS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -2.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.3% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CBRS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CBRS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | -5.3% | 3.2% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | -2.9% | 5.3% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 3.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 41.2% | 17.8% | 87% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CBRS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 143 | 24.0B USD | 18 | 30 | |
| 146 | 13.3B USD | 17 | 50 | |
| 147 | 14.5B USD | 10 | 40 | |
| 147 | 12.2B USD | 10 | 48 | |
| 149 | 23.2B USD | 0 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score