Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CART · against 150 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #106 of 151 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CART · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | CART | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 3.2% | 4.7% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | 4.8% | 8.2% | 19% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 8.5% | 5.8% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 17.1% | 30.4% | 32% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 5 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 101 | 10.0B USD | 37 | 55 | |
| 103 | 75.5B CNY (≈$10.6B) | 36 | 56 | |
| 103 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 36 | 45 | |
| 103 | 23.5B USD | 36 | 62 | |
| 106 | 13.8B USD | 35 | 70 | |
| 106 | 22.7B USD | 35 | 55 | |
| 108 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 34 | 53 | |
| 108 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 34 | 53 | |
| 108 | 17.1B USD | 34 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score