Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CarGurus, Inc.
How CarGurus, Inc. stacks up
CARG · against 112 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 113 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CARG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.1% vs peer median 8.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 10.2% vs peer median 7.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CARG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CARG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 5.6% | 2.9% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 8.9% | 8.0% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 9.7% | 6.3% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 7.8% | 45.1% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CARG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 37 | 505.7B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 62 | 71 | |
| 38 | 4.2B GBP (≈$5.4B) | 61 | 68 | |
| 38 | 6.4B ILS (≈$1.7B) | 61 | 53 | |
| 38 | 4.1B USD | 61 | 44 | |
| 41 | 3.0B USD | 59 | 69 | |
| 41 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 59 | 52 | |
| 41 | 4.9B USD | 59 | 23 | |
| 44 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 57 | 50 | |
| 45 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 56 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score