Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CARE · against 247 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #25 of 248 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including CARE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | CARE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 231 reported | 8.8% | 9.8% | 44% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 35 reported | Not reported | 8.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 249 reported | 2.7% | 1.0% | 86% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 246 reported | 27.9% | 10.4% | 98% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 259 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 92 | |
| 3 | 447.9B KRW (≈$322M) | 97 | ||
| 4 | 16.3B THB (≈$458M) | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 332M EUR (≈$365M) | 96 | 70 | |
| 21 | 380M USD | 89 | 61 | |
| 22 | 118.7B JPY (≈$807M) | 88 | 65 | |
| 22 | 541M CAD (≈$395M) | 88 | 59 | |
| 22 | 10.7B TRY (≈$321M) | 88 | 90 | |
| 25 | 630M USD | 87 | 90 | |
| 25 | 38.6B TRY (≈$1.2B) | 87 | 67 | |
| 25 | 835M USD | 87 | 39 | |
| 28 | 8.1B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 85 | 70 | |
| 28 | 1.4B SAR (≈$365M) | 85 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score