Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Capstone Holding Corp.
How Capstone Holding Corp. stacks up
CAPS · against 0 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
34/ 100
No other companies to compare with in this group.
Ranked #1 of 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CAPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.7% vs peer median -0.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1 reported | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 0 reported | Not reported | — | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1 reported | -8.7% | -8.7% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2M USD | 34 | 13 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score