Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Capstone Holding Corp.
How Capstone Holding Corp. stacks up
CAPS · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #142 of 183 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CAPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.7% vs peer median -0.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 4.5% | 9.9% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 17.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -8.7% | 1.5% | 11% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 138 | 216M USD | 35 | 45 | |
| 138 | 182M USD | 35 | 53 | |
| 138 | 467M USD | 35 | 19 | |
| 138 | 414M USD | 35 | 50 | |
| 142 | 2M USD | 34 | 13 | |
| 143 | 5.5B USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 143 | 15.3B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 143 | 1.6B USD | 33 | 29 | |
| 146 | 2.0B USD | 32 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score