Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CAPL · against 105 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #95 of 106 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 8
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CAPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CAPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 101 reported | Not reported | 0.56× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 104 reported | 0.32 | 0.44 | 62% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 107 reported | 0.76× | 1.49× | 15% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 4 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1.4B USD | 97 | 80 | |
| 91 | 534M USD | 10 | 38 | |
| 92 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 10 | 19 | |
| 93 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 9 | 36 | |
| 94 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 8 | 38 | |
| 95 | 809M USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 96 | 942M USD | 6 | 69 | |
| 97 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 59 | |
| 98 | 759M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 99 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score