Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CrossAmerica Partners LP
How CrossAmerica Partners LP stacks up
CAPL · against 98 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 99 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CAPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.3% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 20.9% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 0.3% | -1.4% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 68 reported | 20.9% | -8.6% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | -5.4% | -1.0% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 4 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 45 | 674M USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 45 | 1.6B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 47 | 697M USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 48 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 45 | 68 | |
| 48 | 809M USD | 45 | 39 | |
| 48 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 45 | 35 | |
| 51 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 44 | 39 | |
| 51 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 44 | 54 | |
| 53 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 43 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score