Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CAMT · against 325 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #250 of 326 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CAMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | CAMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 322 reported | 0.6% | 2.4% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 330 reported | 2.0% | 4.3% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 157 reported | Not reported | 2.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 322 reported | 12.0% | 24.3% | 18% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 1 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 | |
| 5 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 243 | 36.6B CNY (≈$5.1B) | 32 | 73 | |
| 243 | 10.5B USD | 32 | 36 | |
| 250 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 31 | 49 | |
| 250 | 3.4B USD | 31 | 69 | |
| 250 | 5.2B USD | 31 | 61 | |
| 253 | 116.7B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 30 | 41 | |
| 253 | 4.6B USD | 30 | 43 | |
| 255 | 20.9B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 29 | 26 | |
| 255 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 29 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score