Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Calix, Inc.
How Calix, Inc. stacks up
CALX · against 459 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #218 of 460 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CALX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CALX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CALX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 452 reported | 2.2% | 2.4% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 464 reported | 4.1% | 4.5% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 182 reported | 4.1% | 3.1% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 454 reported | 33.9% | 31.3% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CALX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 218 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 72 | |
| 218 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 51 | 67 | |
| 218 | 17.0B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 51 | 44 | |
| 218 | 128.4B TWD (≈$4.0B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 218 | 2.1B USD | 51 | 64 | |
| 224 | 47.6B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 50 | 28 | |
| 224 | 22.9B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 68 | |
| 224 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 224 | 2.3B USD | 50 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score