Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CALX · against 462 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #153 of 463 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)46 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CALX · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CALX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 452 reported | 0.02× | 0.23× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 443 reported | 1.32 | 0.88 | 25% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 458 reported | 2.83× | 1.89× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 149 | 26.3B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 67 | 60 | |
| 150 | 1.8B USD | 67 | 86 | |
| 151 | 28.7B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 67 | 28 | |
| 152 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 153 | 2.1B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 154 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 35 | |
| 155 | 76.2B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 67 | 72 | |
| 156 | 3.8B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 157 | 1.8B USD | 66 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score