Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Caleres, Inc.
How Caleres, Inc. stacks up
CAL · against 574 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #146 of 575 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score59 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including CAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 566 reported | 11.6% | 3.2% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 586 reported | 9.6% | 8.3% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 13.8% | 7.1% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 568 reported | 148.2% | 62.9% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 146 | 4.1B CNY (≈$581M) | 74 | 65 | |
| 146 | 105.6B JPY (≈$718M) | 74 | 55 | |
| 146 | 123.4B JPY (≈$839M) | 74 | 64 | |
| 146 | 876M USD | 74 | 44 | |
| 146 | 454M USD | 74 | 45 | |
| 146 | 423M EUR (≈$465M) | 74 | 66 | |
| 146 | 387M USD | 74 | 47 | |
| 153 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 73 | 44 | |
| 153 | 3.8B CNY (≈$531M) | 73 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score