Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Caleres, Inc.
How Caleres, Inc. stacks up
CAL · against 586 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
42/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #278 of 587 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score73 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including CAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital, but weaker operating margin and return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 72% of peers. Operating margin: 3.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 2.3% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 558 reported | 11.0% | 5.4% | 75% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 585 reported | 3.1% | 5.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 557 reported | 2.3% | 2.3% | 50% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 545 reported | 7.7% | 5.4% | 62% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 588 reported | 44.8% | 27.2% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 273 | 3.5B DKK (≈$529M) | 43 | 50 | |
| 278 | 5.7B CNY (≈$801M) | 42 | 51 | |
| 278 | 5.0B CNY (≈$697M) | 42 | 36 | |
| 278 | 3.3B CNY (≈$463M) | 42 | 53 | |
| 278 | 454M USD | 42 | 45 | |
| 278 | 28.4B INR (≈$341M) | 42 | 60 | |
| 283 | 3.1B CNY (≈$429M) | 41 | 50 | |
| 283 | 5.3B HKD (≈$677M) | 41 | 35 | |
| 283 | 1.23T KRW (≈$885M) | 41 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score