Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Caleres, Inc.
How Caleres, Inc. stacks up
CAL · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #221 of 362 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score25 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including CAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital, but weaker operating margin and return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 72% of peers. Operating margin: 3.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 2.3% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 11.0% | 9.5% | 55% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 3.1% | 7.1% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | 2.3% | 4.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | 7.7% | 11.8% | 39% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 44.8% | 36.0% | 69% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 218 | 1.3B USD | 43 | 44 | |
| 218 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score