Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Conagra Brands, Inc.
How Conagra Brands, Inc. stacks up
CAG · against 121 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #51 of 122 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CAG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -27.6% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.7% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | -27.6% | 5.0% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 11.6% | 8.8% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 50 reported | 12.7% | 6.9% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 93.1% | 42.2% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 1 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 4 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.8B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 47 | 86.5B CNY (≈$12.1B) | 58 | 52 | |
| 47 | 613.1B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 58 | 71 | |
| 47 | 154.7B ZAR (≈$8.5B) | 58 | 60 | |
| 50 | 797.3B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 51 | 6.9B USD | 56 | 36 | |
| 51 | 4.8B USD | 56 | 34 | |
| 53 | 539.4B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 55 | 51 | |
| 53 | 94.2B NOK (≈$9.0B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 55 | 617.4B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 54 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score