Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Conagra Brands, Inc.
How Conagra Brands, Inc. stacks up
CAG · against 122 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Profitability
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 123 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CAG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.5% vs peer median 7.7%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 4.1% vs peer median 4.0%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 66% of peers. Operating margin: 11.2% vs peer median 7.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 119 reported | 7.5% | 12.3% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 123 reported | 11.2% | 9.3% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 116 reported | 4.1% | 5.3% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 116 reported | -24.9% | 12.5% | 1% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 123 reported | 23.8% | 36.8% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAGScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score