Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CABA · against 299 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #193 of 300 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)31 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CABA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CABA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 270 reported | 0.12× | 0.19× | 61% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 285 reported | 3.26 | 0.51 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 296 reported | 5.79× | 3.16× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 4 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 5 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 189 | 5.0B THB (≈$141M) | 41 | 63 | |
| 190 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 40 | 18 | |
| 191 | 2.2B CNY (≈$310M) | 40 | 39 | |
| 192 | 271M USD | 40 | 14 | |
| 193 | 241M USD | 40 | ||
| 194 | 212M AUD (≈$140M) | 39 | 61 | |
| 195 | 6.2B THB (≈$174M) | 39 | 36 | |
| 196 | 2.1B CNY (≈$301M) | 39 | 21 | |
| 197 | 360M USD | 39 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score