Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
How Beazer Homes USA, Inc. stacks up
BZH · against 588 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #539 of 589 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score58 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including BZH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -17.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -0.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BZH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BZH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 584 reported | -1.0% | 4.1% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 601 reported | -0.5% | 8.9% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | -17.2% | 7.4% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 586 reported | 129.6% | 60.7% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BZH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 539 | 5.2B CNY (≈$732M) | 6 | 44 | |
| 539 | 11.8B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 6 | 23 | |
| 539 | 3.4B CNY (≈$474M) | 6 | 37 | |
| 539 | 502M USD | 6 | 2 | |
| 539 | 893M USD | 6 | 21 | |
| 539 | 766M USD | 6 | 16 | |
| 539 | 576M USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 539 | 563M USD | 6 | 47 | |
| 539 | 7.8B SEK (≈$776M) | 6 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score