Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
How Beazer Homes USA, Inc. stacks up
BZH · against 604 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
13/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #532 of 605 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score54 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including BZH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 13?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 88% of peers. Operating margin: -1.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 84% of peers. Return on assets: -0.3% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BZH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BZH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 578 reported | -1.2% | 7.1% | 14% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 603 reported | -1.8% | 6.3% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 575 reported | -0.3% | 3.1% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 564 reported | -0.7% | 7.1% | 19% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 606 reported | 12.8% | 30.1% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BZH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 532 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 13 | 9 | |
| 532 | 22.0B TWD (≈$681M) | 13 | 24 | |
| 532 | 3.3B CNY (≈$456M) | 13 | 23 | |
| 532 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 13 | 17 | |
| 532 | 893M USD | 13 | 21 | |
| 532 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 19 | |
| 538 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 12 | 25 | |
| 538 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 12 | 30 | |
| 538 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 12 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score