Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Beyond Meat, Inc.
How Beyond Meat, Inc. stacks up
BYND · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #147 of 148 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including BYND · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -13.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: -15.6% vs peer median 2.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BYND, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BYND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | -15.6% | 4.1% | 4% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | Not reported | 4.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | -13.0% | 3.5% | 3% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BYND| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 142 | 13M USD | 4 | 24 | |
| 142 | 364M USD | 4 | 26 | |
| 145 | 309M USD | 3 | 16 | |
| 145 | 229M USD | 3 | 24 | |
| 147 | 125M USD | 2 | 3 | |
| 148 | 72M USD | 0 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score