Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Boxabl Inc.
How Boxabl Inc. stacks up
BXBL · against 603 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #537 of 604 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score75 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including BXBL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -2.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BXBL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BXBL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 596 reported | -1.0% | 3.3% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 615 reported | -2.6% | 8.3% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | -5.4% | 7.3% | 14% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 597 reported | -12.5% | 62.2% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BXBL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 537 | 5.2B CNY (≈$732M) | 6 | 44 | |
| 537 | 12.5B TWD (≈$386M) | 6 | 27 | |
| 537 | 1.9B CNY (≈$259M) | 6 | 19 | |
| 537 | 3.4B CNY (≈$474M) | 6 | 37 | |
| 537 | 502M USD | 6 | 2 | |
| 537 | 893M USD | 6 | 21 | |
| 537 | 766M USD | 6 | 16 | |
| 537 | 576M USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 537 | 563M USD | 6 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score