Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BWA · against 170 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 171 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BWA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BWA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 168 reported | 0.70× | 0.70× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 171 reported | 1.14 | 0.89 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 167 reported | 2.13× | 1.35× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 74 | 232.0B TRY (≈$7.0B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 75 | 12.1B USD | 43 | 57 | |
| 76 | 8.2B AUD (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 58 | |
| 77 | 12.2B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 78 | 10.5B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 79 | 13.5B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 80 | 53.8B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 40 | 67 | |
| 81 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 82 | 13.9B USD | 37 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score