Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BorgWarner Inc.
How BorgWarner Inc. stacks up
BWA · against 171 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
81/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #40 of 172 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score28 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including BWA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 110.0% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BWA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BWA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 172 reported | 2.2% | 5.9% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 148 reported | 110.0% | 6.8% | 95% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 6.0% | 7.6% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BWA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 4 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 4 | 524.8B INR (≈$6.3B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 37 | 9.8B USD | 83 | 57 | |
| 39 | 1.21T INR (≈$14.5B) | 82 | 64 | |
| 40 | 1.09T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 81 | 71 | |
| 40 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 81 | 77 | |
| 40 | 10.5B USD | 81 | 57 | |
| 40 | 16.6B USD | 81 | 58 | |
| 40 | 550.9B INR (≈$6.6B) | 81 | 71 | |
| 45 | 8.9B USD | 80 | 53 | |
| 45 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 80 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score