Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BVS · against 496 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #413 of 497 · scores higher than 17% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)46 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including BVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 465 reported | 0.95× | 0.17× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 474 reported | 0.64 | 0.41 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 491 reported | 1.69× | 2.84× | 29% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 409 | 18.7B THB (≈$525M) | 20 | 55 | |
| 410 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 20 | 68 | |
| 411 | 133.4B JPY (≈$907M) | 19 | 53 | |
| 412 | 1.5B USD | 19 | 26 | |
| 413 | 748M USD | 19 | 62 | |
| 414 | 21.1B ZAR (≈$1.2B) | 19 | 60 | |
| 415 | 6.7B CNY (≈$938M) | 18 | 30 | |
| 416 | 5.1B CNY (≈$709M) | 18 | 12 | |
| 417 | 588M USD | 18 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score