Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bioventus Inc.
How Bioventus Inc. stacks up
BVS · against 440 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #87 of 441 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including BVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BVS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 451 reported | 3.1% | 3.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 241 reported | Not reported | 3.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 434 reported | 4.4% | 4.6% | 49% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BVS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 885M USD | 99 | 33 | |
| 82 | 487M USD | 77 | 29 | |
| 82 | 1.1B USD | 77 | 32 | |
| 82 | 468M EUR (≈$514M) | 77 | 57 | |
| 82 | 5.5B NOK (≈$523M) | 77 | 71 | |
| 87 | 748M USD | 76 | 62 | |
| 87 | 1.1B CAD (≈$807M) | 76 | 60 | |
| 87 | 1.2B USD | 76 | 39 | |
| 87 | 469M USD | 76 | 45 | |
| 87 | 660M GBP (≈$858M) | 76 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score