Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BURL · against 144 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #113 of 145 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including BURL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BURL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 141 reported | 2.95× | 0.71× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 146 reported | 1.43 | 0.91 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 141 reported | 1.17× | 1.45× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 109 | 10.0B USD | 19 | 55 | |
| 110 | 14.0B USD | 19 | 47 | |
| 111 | 8.6B USD | 19 | 55 | |
| 112 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 19 | 58 | |
| 113 | 15.1B USD | 18 | 54 | |
| 114 | 17.0B CAD (≈$12.4B) | 17 | 59 | |
| 115 | 9.8B USD | 16 | 57 | |
| 116 | 13.1B USD | 16 | 56 | |
| 117 | 14.5B USD | 16 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score