Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BTE · against 126 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #13 of 127 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including BTE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 126 reported | 0.07× | 0.51× | 91% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 126 reported | 0.74 | 0.51 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 2.82× | 1.54× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 9 | 3.6B USD | 94 | 77 | |
| 10 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 94 | 51 | |
| 11 | 1.8B USD | 94 | 61 | |
| 12 | 66.82T IDR (≈$4.1B) | 92 | 63 | |
| 13 | 3.3B USD | 92 | 52 | |
| 14 | 27.6B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 91 | 48 | |
| 15 | 4.6B CAD (≈$3.4B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 16 | 3.9B USD | 90 | 62 | |
| 17 | 27.6B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 89 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score