Ranked #130 of 144 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
27 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including BTBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -23.6% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on equity: -73.7% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BTBT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
BTBT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 134 reported
-29.1%
7.3%
4%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 37 reported
-225.3%
8.6%
3%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 146 reported
-23.6%
1.1%
2%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 142 reported
-52.2%
10.1%
3%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 155 reported
57.1%
0.0%
81%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
