Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
How Black Stone Minerals, L.P. stacks up
BSM · against 126 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #97 of 127 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including BSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -18.6% vs peer median -1.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.9% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.3% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 130 reported | -3.9% | 0.2% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 11.3% | -0.9% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 126 reported | -18.6% | -3.0% | 10% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 4 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 93 | 2.8B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 27 | 56 | |
| 94 | 2.9B USD | 26 | 29 | |
| 95 | 5.7B CAD (≈$4.1B) | 25 | 51 | |
| 96 | 13.0B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 23 | 23 | |
| 97 | 3.2B USD | 22 | 66 | |
| 97 | 58.0B THB (≈$1.6B) | 22 | 50 | |
| 99 | 1.9B USD | 21 | 51 | |
| 100 | 8.8B AUD (≈$5.8B) | 20 | 57 | |
| 101 | 27.6B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 18 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score