Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BSAC · against 165 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #55 of 166 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including BSAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | BSAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 137 reported | Not reported | 10.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 19 reported | Not reported | 14.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 166 reported | 1.5% | 1.3% | 59% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 164 reported | 23.3% | 12.8% | 90% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 171 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 11.4B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 98 | 61 | |
| 50 | 483.4B ZAR (≈$26.6B) | 77 | ||
| 50 | 18.4B EUR (≈$20.3B) | 77 | 67 | |
| 53 | 73.1B BRL (≈$13.2B) | 76 | 71 | |
| 53 | 10.4B USD | 76 | 66 | |
| 55 | 15.0B USD | 75 | 52 | |
| 55 | 264.4B MXN (≈$14.3B) | 75 | 53 | |
| 55 | 834.8B INR (≈$10.0B) | 75 | 68 | |
| 58 | 77.7B SAR (≈$21.0B) | 74 | 65 | |
| 58 | 64.1B SAR (≈$17.3B) | 74 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score