Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BRZE · against 329 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #171 of 330 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BRZE · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BRZE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 317 reported | 0.16× | 0.31× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 316 reported | 0.91 | 1.02 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 326 reported | 1.27× | 1.84× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 167 | 128.4B TWD (≈$4.0B) | 47 | 43 | |
| 168 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 46 | 56 | |
| 169 | 148.5B TWD (≈$4.6B) | 46 | 64 | |
| 170 | 5.20T KRW (≈$3.7B) | 46 | 58 | |
| 171 | 5.2B USD | 46 | 40 | |
| 172 | 7.7B USD | 46 | 47 | |
| 173 | 256.0B TWD (≈$7.9B) | 45 | 70 | |
| 174 | 5.6B USD | 45 | 66 | |
| 175 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 45 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score