Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BRBS · against 171 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #140 of 172 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score21 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including BRBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | BRBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 156 reported | -2.8% | 8.5% | 9% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 37 reported | Not reported | 9.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 174 reported | 0.4% | 1.1% | 24% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 170 reported | -0.1% | 10.4% | 11% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 182 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 2 | 447.9B KRW (≈$322M) | 97 | ||
| 2 | 289M USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 16.3B THB (≈$458M) | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 332M EUR (≈$365M) | 96 | 70 | |
| 134 | 452M EUR (≈$498M) | 13 | 49 | |
| 134 | 591M CHF (≈$679M) | 13 | 64 | |
| 139 | 503M EUR (≈$554M) | 12 | 44 | |
| 140 | 44.5B JPY (≈$303M) | 11 | 59 | |
| 140 | 357M USD | 11 | 38 | |
| 142 | 2.5B HKD (≈$315M) | 10 | ||
| 142 | 328M USD | 10 | 42 | |
| 144 | 2.9B HKD (≈$375M) | 9 | 63 | |
| 144 | 430M USD | 9 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score