Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Boston Omaha Corporation
How Boston Omaha Corporation stacks up
BOC · against 803 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #523 of 804 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including BOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 796 reported | -3.1% | 2.7% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 814 reported | 4.5% | 6.4% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | -1.5% | 3.4% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 802 reported | 122.0% | 56.9% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BOCScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score