Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BOBS · against 409 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #165 of 410 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 57
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including BOBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BOBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 399 reported | 1.68× | 0.53× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 399 reported | Not reported | 0.66 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 396 reported | 0.90× | 1.48× | 17% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score