Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc.
How Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc. stacks up
BOBS · against 412 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
72/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #127 of 413 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score63 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including BOBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Return on assets is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 82% of peers. Return on invested capital: 17.7% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BOBS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BOBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 391 reported | 17.7% | 9.0% | 84% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 412 reported | 7.7% | 7.9% | 48% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 394 reported | Not reported | 4.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 380 reported | Not reported | 10.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 416 reported | 46.9% | 31.5% | 78% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BOBS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 121 | 3.0B USD | 73 | 62 | |
| 121 | 1.7B USD | 73 | 60 | |
| 127 | 378.4B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 72 | 68 | |
| 127 | 1.4B USD | 72 | 65 | |
| 127 | 2.2B USD | 72 | 64 | |
| 127 | 2.5B USD | 72 | 59 | |
| 127 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 72 | 60 | |
| 127 | 34.5B ZAR (≈$1.9B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 127 | 1.8B USD | 72 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score