Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc.
How Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc. stacks up
BOBS · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
49/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #161 of 356 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including BOBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BOBS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BOBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.9% | 4.3% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 8.3% | 8.4% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 5.2% | 5.3% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 23.8% | 35.8% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BOBS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 155 | 474M USD | 50 | 30 | |
| 155 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 161 | 9.8B USD | 49 | 57 | |
| 161 | 117.0B USD | 49 | 56 | |
| 161 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 | |
| 161 | 3.2B USD | 49 | 46 | |
| 161 | 18.6B USD | 49 | 43 | |
| 161 | 119.7B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 161 | 3.0B USD | 49 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score