Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
How Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. stacks up
BNL · against 147 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #60 of 148 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score30 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BNL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.4% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BNL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BNL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | 4.2% | 5.0% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 6.4% | 5.4% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 6.9% | 6.4% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 83.1% | 97.2% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BNL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 89 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 54 | 2.5B USD | 56 | 57 | |
| 54 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 56 | 56 | |
| 54 | 3.2B SGD (≈$2.4B) | 56 | 58 | |
| 54 | 5.7B USD | 56 | 56 | |
| 60 | 3.8B USD | 55 | 42 | |
| 60 | 5.9B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 62 | 1.8B GBP (≈$2.4B) | 54 | 49 | |
| 63 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 63 | 5.2B USD | 53 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score