Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BMO · against 53 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #42 of 54 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including BMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | BMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 5.2% | 7.9% | 11% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | Not reported | 11.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 23 reported | 29.1% | 12.0% | 86% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 52.8% | 51.3% | 54% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 658.7B HKD (≈$84.3B) | 90 | 42 | |
| 2 | 935.3B HKD (≈$119.7B) | 89 | 61 | |
| 3 | 16.32T JPY (≈$110.9B) | 87 | ||
| 4 | 66.1B USD | 86 | 93 | |
| 5 | 74.5B USD | 83 | 54 | |
| 38 | 105.8B USD | 21 | 46 | |
| 38 | 74.3B USD | 21 | 34 | |
| 41 | 2.10T TWD (≈$65.2B) | 20 | 37 | |
| 42 | 121.5B AUD (≈$80.2B) | 19 | 19 | |
| 42 | 119.3B USD | 19 | 34 | |
| 42 | 147.0B USD | 19 | 42 | |
| 45 | 93.4B CHF (≈$107.4B) | 18 | 51 | |
| 46 | 64.0B USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 47 | 125.4B AUD (≈$82.8B) | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score