Ranked #169 of 173 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
8 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including BMNR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -75.3% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on equity: -150.9% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BMNR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
BMNR
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 149 reported
-62.3%
10.8%
1%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 22 reported
-14504.5%
13.6%
0%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 173 reported
-75.3%
1.3%
0%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 171 reported
-150.9%
12.6%
1%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 180 reported
84.4%
0.0%
92%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
