Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Badger Meter, Inc.
How Badger Meter, Inc. stacks up
BMI · against 350 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #167 of 351 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 346 reported | 2.8% | 2.4% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 4.5% | 4.5% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 165 reported | 3.4% | 3.1% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 349 reported | 15.4% | 26.4% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 1 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 | |
| 5 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 165 | 2.8B USD | 53 | 70 | |
| 165 | 2.7B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 167 | 217.4B TWD (≈$6.7B) | 52 | 34 | |
| 167 | 122.9B TWD (≈$3.8B) | 52 | 61 | |
| 167 | 4.4B USD | 52 | 64 | |
| 167 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 52 | 56 | |
| 167 | 448.1B INR (≈$5.4B) | 52 | 69 | |
| 167 | 5.8B USD | 52 | 53 | |
| 167 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score