Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BMI · against 356 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #74 of 357 · scores higher than 79% of peers · safety percentile 76
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including BMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 342 reported | 0.03× | 0.30× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 342 reported | 0.64 | 1.01 | 77% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 353 reported | 2.42× | 1.85× | 66% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 70 | 35.5B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 78 | 54 | |
| 71 | 3.1B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 72 | 3.0B USD | 78 | 50 | |
| 73 | 86.4B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 77 | 71 | |
| 74 | 4.4B USD | 76 | 64 | |
| 75 | 3.9B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 76 | 55 | |
| 76 | 3.4B USD | 75 | 69 | |
| 77 | 24.1B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 75 | 64 | |
| 78 | 35.4B NOK (≈$3.4B) | 75 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score