Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Badger Meter, Inc.
How Badger Meter, Inc. stacks up
BMI · against 357 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #53 of 358 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score48 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including BMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 78% of peers. Return on invested capital: 18.9% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 83% of peers. Operating margin: 18.6% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on assets: 12.6% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 339 reported | 18.9% | 9.7% | 73% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 356 reported | 18.6% | 8.2% | 79% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 346 reported | 12.6% | 4.0% | 91% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 339 reported | 18.5% | 10.7% | 77% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 359 reported | 41.3% | 37.9% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 7.3B USD | 99 | 68 | |
| 5 | 388.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 47 | 6.4B USD | 86 | 62 | |
| 47 | 4.1B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 47 | 5.2B CHF (≈$5.9B) | 86 | 52 | |
| 53 | 17.0B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 85 | 74 | |
| 53 | 4.4B USD | 85 | 64 | |
| 53 | 3.0B USD | 85 | 51 | |
| 53 | 3.9B USD | 85 | 76 | |
| 57 | 4.41T KRW (≈$3.2B) | 84 | 66 | |
| 57 | 961.5B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 84 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score