Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Blue Water Acquisition Corp. III
How Blue Water Acquisition Corp. III stacks up
BLUW · against 61 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #54 of 62 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including BLUW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.0% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLUW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLUW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 3.0% | 5.4% | 23% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | -0.4% | 8.2% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | -2.8% | 109.3% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLUW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 12.8B THB (≈$359M) | 97 | 55 | |
| 5 | 6.8B THB (≈$191M) | 96 | 41 | |
| 50 | 333M EUR (≈$366M) | 26 | 45 | |
| 51 | 345M USD | 24 | 21 | |
| 52 | 308M EUR (≈$338M) | 20 | 40 | |
| 53 | 434M USD | 16 | 43 | |
| 54 | 336M USD | 15 | ||
| 55 | 394M USD | 14 | ||
| 56 | 372M USD | 9 | 35 | |
| 57 | 219M USD | 8 | 20 | |
| 58 | 385M USD | 7 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score