Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Blend Labs, Inc.
How Blend Labs, Inc. stacks up
BLND · against 404 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #302 of 405 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score50 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including BLND · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 88% of peers. Operating margin: -12.0% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 0.0% vs peer median 2.9%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLND, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 368 reported | Not reported | 2.7% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 400 reported | -12.0% | 3.3% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 397 reported | 0.0% | 1.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 387 reported | 2.1% | 3.3% | 46% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 74.8% | 28.6% | 93% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLND| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 298 | 10.5B TWD (≈$327M) | 17 | 31 | |
| 298 | 300M AUD (≈$198M) | 17 | 23 | |
| 302 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 16 | 19 | |
| 302 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 16 | 30 | |
| 302 | 274M USD | 16 | 27 | |
| 302 | 407M CAD (≈$297M) | 16 | 25 | |
| 306 | 3.0B CNY (≈$414M) | 15 | 31 | |
| 306 | 3.4B CNY (≈$475M) | 15 | 30 | |
| 308 | 2.2B CNY (≈$304M) | 14 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score